Why did Alexander Emancipate the Serfs and to whos
This essay Why did Alexander Emancipate the Serfs and to whos has a total of 1064 words and 5 pages.
Why did Alexander Emancipate the Serfs and to whose benefit?
Various debates over the reasons for the emancipation of the serfs have been put forward by historians. They include military, social, political, educational and economic reasons, and each has a strong case. It is not known precisely why Alexander emancipated the serfs, but the strong sense of duty he had towards the preservation of the state meant that, once he had decided that emancipation was necessary for the welfare of the autocracy, little could be done to prevent it.
The emancipation itself was certainly stimulated, at least in part, by the Crimean defeat to France and the United Kingdom. The Tsar was well aware of the drawbacks of Russia’s huge standing army and the costs of maintaining this in peace time. The lack of a reserve also hindered the Russian cause when it came to war, and the defeat in Crimea served to prove to Alexander that the Russian army was highly inefficient; something needed to be done. The hierarchy of Russia was such that the nobility and autocracy constantly feared rebellion and revolution; the cause of these, they feared, would arise from Western ideas filtering into the empire. Because of this, the serfs were forced to complete a twenty-five year conscription if they were required for the army, this way very few would return to spread the news of revolution to their villages. If serfdom was abolished then this would make way for a vast amount of army reforms to both modernise the army whilst reducing costs, two important factors for an increasingly competitive Europe. This, of course, would benefit the Russian state as a whole, but specifically Alexander as it would increase his personal power dramatically to be the only autocratic leader of a European power when that European power could again challenge all others with a modern and efficient army.
Linked to the efficiency of the Russian army was the need for new industry and technology, as well as a greater expansion of the rail network. Emancipation would allow for a greater interest in business as well as a lack of worry about the spread of western ideas which would prompt an increase in investment from wealthy European businessmen. As the serfs were required to pay money for their freedom, and this money was in turn given to banks by the heavily indebted nobility, banks also became major investors in Russian industry. The banks were definitely major benefactors of the emancipation. Though Alexander and his aids would not have entirely foreseen this progress they would have predicted it and will have known that serf emancipation would lead to a sharp rise in industry.
The fear of revolution was another prominent reason for emancipation. Alexander said to the nobility in a famous speech in 1856 that it was better for the emancipation of the serfs to come ‘from above’ than ‘from below’. This shows us that he clearly foresaw rebellion and that serf emancipation was heavily influenced by his fear. Alternatively, it has been argued that he was simply saying this to win over the Russian nobility, as the fear of rebellion and civil war would have been far greater than the worry of losing their power over the peasant classes. From either viewpoint the eradication of serfdom is shown to have happened largely for the benefit of the upper classes, not for the moral guilt of keeping people in poverty and slavery. In fact, this moral realisation was well acknowledged by the Tsars prior to the reign of Alexander, the reason they ignored it was for fear of compromising their own power.
On the face of it, it seems that we can include the gentry with the Tsar and the state in the benefiting from the emancipation of the serfs. However, when we analyse the reality of the aristocracy’s situation we can see that they did not actually benefit at all. Although they were given bonds which were sellable on the stock market in compensation for the emancipation, they lost their main source of income and these bonds were, in reality, little relief to the already financially burdened gentry. Not only did they lose their free source of labour, the serfs, thus increasing their costs of living and earning, but they
Topics Related to Why did Alexander Emancipate the Serfs and to whos
Serfdom, Russia, Emancipation reform, Russian nobility, Russian Empire, Serfdom in Russia, House of Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov, Georgia within the Russian Empire
Essays Related to Why did Alexander Emancipate the Serfs and to whos
NapoleonNapoleon Napoleon was born on August 15, 1769 in Ajaccio, Corsica, and was given the name Napoleone Buonaperte. He was the second of eight children of Carlo and Letizia Buonaperte, both of the Corsican-Italian gentry. Before Napoleone, no Buonaparte had ever been a professional soldier. His father Carlo, was a lawyer who had fought for Corsican independence, but after the French occupied the island in 1768, he served as a prosecutor and a judge and entered the French aristocracy as a count. Thro
The Hutu and Tutsi Tribes In RwandaThe Hutu and Tutsi Tribes In Rwanda The Hutu and Tutsi\'s tribes of Rwanda have been at war for centuries. The fighting began 5 centuries ago when the Tutsi a warrior tribe of Hamatic origin invaded Rwanda from the North. The Hutu a peaceful tribe of farmers could not defend themselves and were reduced to serfdom, each Hutu choosing a Tutsi master. In the 18 century the Hutu rebelled and took control of the government and mistreated the Tutsi. The president a Hutu, Habyiberman, was accused of be
The Hutu TribeThe Hutu Tribe The culture of the Hutu and Tutsi tribes of Rwanda, Africa interests me for many reasons. One reason is that they are so diverse from our American way of life. Another reason is that I have heard a little bit about them in the news and by talking to people. This sparked my interest and made me want to learn more about them. I will cover a wide variety of information in my report. This will include the land where they live, their way of life, their history and ancestry, and what th
Analysis Of The French RevolutionAnalysis Of The French Revolution What were the causes and the effects of the French Revolution? The major cause of the French Revolution was the disputes between the different types of social classes in French society. The French Revolution of 1789-1799 was one of the most important events in the history of the world. The Revolution led to many changes in France, which at the time of the Revolution, was the most powerful state in Europe. The Revolution led to the development of new political fo
Caesar And NaopoleonCaesar And Naopoleon Napoleon Bonaparte\'s success as a military leader and conqueror can also be seen in another great leader, Julius Caesar. Both Napoleon and Caesar achieved great glory by bringing their countries out of turmoil. It was Caesar, that Napoleon modeled himself after, he wanted to be as great, if not greater than Caesar. Looking to the past, Napoleon knew what steps to take in order to achieve success Napoleon devoured books on the art of war. Volume after volume of military theo
Catherine IICatherine II Women fell under her spell as well as men, for underlying her engaging femininity was a masculine strength which gave her the courage to present a bland and smiling mask in the face of the greatest tribulations. Sophia Augusta Frederica was born into a small Prussian kingdom in 1729. Her hometown was in Stettin, Germany. Her birth was a great disappointment to her parents, her father, Prince Christian August of Anhalt- Zerbst and her mother, Johanna Elizabeth, daughter of the prince
CyprusCyprus Cyprus, an island in the Eastern Mediterranean, at the cross-roads of three continents - Europe, Asia and Africa - has one of the oldest histories of the world, dating back 9000 years. Its strategic position, its wealth in forests and mineral deposits, as well as its skilled craftsmen, made it the prized possession of the powers of the day. Cultural influences came from all directions - all m
Hutus' and Tutsis'Hutus\' and Tutsis\' The culture of the Hutu and Tutsi tribes of Rwanda, Africa interests me for many reasons. One reason is that they are so diverse from our American way of life. Another reason is that I have heard a little bit about them in the news and by talking to people. This sparked my interest and made me want to learn more about them. I will cover a wide variety of information in my report. This will include the land where they live, their way of life, their history and ancestry, and w
Napoleon: The War HeroNapoleon: The War Hero Napoleon was born on August 15, 1769 in Ajaccio, Corsica, and was given the name Napoleone Buonaperte. He was the second of eight children of Carlo and Letizia Buonaperte, both of the Corsican-Italian gentry. Before Napoleone, no Buonaparte had ever been a professional soldier. His father Carlo, was a lawyer who had fought for Corsican independence, but after the French occupied the island in 1768, he served as a prosecutor and a judge and entered the French aristocracy as
Catherine The GreatCatherine The Great Catherine the Great: Empress of Russia, (1762-1796) History 120, Section 4 Russell Smith Dr. Homer December 2, 1999 One of the most interesting, hard-working and powerful people to grace the pages of history during the eighteenth century was Catherine II, Empress of Russia. Historians have not always been so kind to her memory, and all too often one reads accounts of her private life, ignoring her many achievements. The stories of her love affairs have been overly misinterpre
Lauren Lay Lauren Lay 11:40 Western Civilization Absolutism: Chapter 15 Wednesday, April 14, 2004 Absolutism The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were hard times in Europe. The Reformation brought much confusion and mishap to the people. Many people believed in The Divine Right of Kings, which eventually led to the formation of an autocracy, or rule by a single person. This person was not to be questioned or disobeyed; this soon became known as absolutism, since the monarch ruled with absolute power, t
The French RevolutionThe French Revolution I. Absolutism A. Absolutism defined 1. In the absolutist state, sovereignty resided in kings--not the nobility or the parliament--who considered themselves responsible to God alone. 2. Absolute kings created new state bureaucracies and standing armies, regulated all the institutions of government, and secured the cooperation of the nobility. a. Some historians deny that absolutism was a stage of development that followed feudalism, but, instead, was administrative monarchy.
Russian PeasantRussian Peasant Nineteenth-century moral opinion condemned serfdom. Russian government commissions wrestled over how to implement the tsar’s desire to emancipate the peasants. Finally, in February 1861, against much opposition from the nobility and the landlords, Alexander II promulgated the long statute ending serfdom. The actual emancipation statue proved to be a disappointment because freedom was not accompanied by land. They had to pay the landlords over a period of forty-nine years for allo
Why did Alexander Emancipate the Serfs and to whosWhy did Alexander Emancipate the Serfs and to whose benefit? Various debates over the reasons for the emancipation of the serfs have been put forward by historians. They include military, social, political, educational and economic reasons, and each has a strong case. It is not known precisely why Alexander emancipated the serfs, but the strong sense of duty he had towards the preservation of the state meant that, once he had decided that emancipation was necessary for the welfare of the autocra
Russian RevolutionRussian Revolution The 1905 Russian revolution was not a ‘dress rehearsal’ as Lenin would put it, but rather an indication of popular belief and attitudes of the people towards Tsar Nicholas II’s autocratic regime and of what was to come if current trends in the government continued. Furthermore, it is difficult to argue that the events of 1905 were in fact an actual full-scale revolution. A revolution by definition is one which at the very least, is aimed at effectively overthrowing a former go
To what extent was Alexander II a Tsar liberator?To what extent was Alexander II a Tsar liberator? Alexander II did introduce a number of reforms, which were quite revolutionary for that period of time. Many historians therefore believe that Alexander II deserves the title ‘Tsar Liberator’. Views of Alexander II do, however, differ to a great extent, When regarding Alexander II Saunders says “his enthusiasm for change lasted a mere four years, it may be that his reputation as the ‘Tsar liberator’ is ill deserved“ 1this strongly suggests that A
United States Intervention in BoliviaUnited States Intervention in Bolivia Thirty years ago, on October 8, 1967, gunfire echoed through a steep ravine of the Andes Mountains in southern Bolivia. The guerrilla band led by Ernesto Che Guevara – a chief lieutenant in the Sierra Maestra, author of a book on guerilla tactics, one-time president of Cuba’s National Bank and later Minister of Industries under Castro, and who renounced his Cuban citizenship and set off to devote his services to the revolutionary cause in other lands – was p
To what extent is the title “Tzar Liberator” a truTo what extent is the title “Tzar Liberator” a true description of Alexander II? “I am not handing over the command in the good order I should have wished, and I am bequeathing you much worry and distress” These were the words of Alexander’s father on his deathbed. The condition of the empire as it was handed down to Alexander II was pitiful; the autocratic system was flawed and neglected. The country’s national debts were continuously ascending and the economy was not going all too well eith
Revolutions of 1917: Revolutions of 1917: Their effect in determining the rise of a single-party state in Russia Russian 99A “No real social change has ever been brought about without a revolution.... Revolution is but thought carried into action.” The people of Russia were struggling before the period of 1917 with massive discontent, the revolutionary movement, and World War I. Whether the revolution was inevitable, historians can not agree but under these factors, the country was ripe for a political, economic
New AgeNew Age After 1500 there were many signs that a new age of world history was beginning, for example the discovery of America and the first European enterprises in Asia. This ³new age² was dominated by the astonishing success of one civilization among many, that of Europe. There was more and more continuous interconnection between events in all countries, but it is to be explained by European efforts. Europeans eventually became ³masters of the globe² and they used their mastery to make the world
EnglandEngland England (Latin Anglia), political division of the island of Great Britain, constituting, with Wales, the principal division of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. England occupies all of the island east of Wales and south of Scotland, another division of the United Kingdom. Established as an independent monarchy many centuries ago, England in time achieved political control over the rest of the island, all the British Isles, and vast sections of the world, becoming
Tiberius GracchusTiberius Gracchus By Tiberius Gracchus’ proposal of the law stated in the lex agaria, I speculate that he is trying to help the poor citizens of Rome, and at the same time, benefit the overall condition of the city. The law stated that those holding more than the legal limit of public land must give that land up, and that this land would be redistributed to “Roman citizens in small allotments...” That Gracchus is trying to help the poorer citizens is shown through the small size of the plot of l
French Revolution Causes and EffectsFrench Revolution Causes and Effects Often in society whenever some particular groups of people acquire too much power or wealth, it will create a class struggle. This usually results in a chain of events that will cause society to change its practices. Whether it is the American Revolution, the Civil Rights movement of the 60\'s and 70\'s, or in the case of the French Revolution, people were willing to lose their lives, just so they could have equal and unbiased treatment. It is almost as if th
RevolutionsRevolutions History\'s revolutions have taken on a distinct shape. Crane Brinton points out this particular pattern inherent to national revolutions in his book Anatomy of a Revolution. Brinton uses a wheel to describe the common cycle that most revolutions share. Brinton claims that the starting block of most revolutions is the societal problems brought forth by the Old Regime. Brinton continues his cycle with the isolated and spontaneous events of dissatisfaction that mark the overthrow of t
HistoryHistory Who shapes history? What shapes history? Do people? Do events? It is a debate as simple yet as complex as the proverbial chicken and egg. People cause events to happen, therefore, it is really people who shape events. But can one person be responsible for any important event? Important events involve the actions of many people, so it is the events then, and not the people that shape history. But what about the people involved in the events? Due to the reciprocity of the arguments, it is
Infamous GeneralsInfamous Generals Thesis Does history repeat itself because people become power hungry? In the years from 58 B.C. to 1821 A.D., two infamous generals led armies to great success, yet met with similar fates. It is my belief that through the use of similar tactics, one general fell victim to a fate shared by another, earlier general. Could this fate have been avoided, if he\'d carefully studied his predecessor\'s mistakes? Introduction: There have been several great military geniuses to come from
Napoleon BonaparteNapoleon Bonaparte I was definitely one of the most influential people in the history of Europe and the rest of the world. He quickly rose through the ranks of being a Corsican National Guard soldier to being the one of the greatest military commanders of all time and the French emperor who would try to conquer the entire world. On August 15, 1769, Napoleon was born into a family that would have a total of 8 children, him being the second. He was the son of Carlo Buonaparte, a lawyer who fought
NAPOLEONNAPOLEON The main controversy over Napoleon is if he was a friend or enemy to the French people. Napoleon\'s prosecutors said that he destroyed the civil liberties of the French people. They also think that he started unnecessary wars of aggression. Another argument is that he ruled above the law like a absolute monarch. People on the defending side of Napoleon say that he saved France from a near anarchic situation in France. He extended the French territory to bring glory to the French people,
Slavery in the U.S.Slavery in the U.S. In North America the first African slaves landed at Jamestown, Virginia, in 1619. Brought by early English privateers, they were subjected to limited servitude, a legalized status of Native American, white, and black servants preceding slavery in most, if not all, the English colonies in the New World. The number of slaves imported was small at first, and it did not seem necessary to define their legal status. Statutory recognition of slavery, however, occurred in Massachuset