This essay Nietzsche vs Descartes has a total of 1758 words and 8 pages.
Nietzsche vs Descartes
Descartes explains the apparent distinction and significance of the human mind over the body in his Meditations on First Philosophy, claiming that the mind (the conscious) is the lone essential part of the human essence.
Nietzsche expresses his beliefs that the body (the unconscious) is key to the human essence. One may find it difficult to decide between these two ideas, for both philosophers pose good arguments on the contradicting sides of this famous dilemma.
However, by analyzing them further, I realize that the qualities of their arguments are only as good as the foundations that they are based upon; one cannot have an understanding of the mind or the body without first having knowledge of the essence of human existence. With this in mind, I will prove that the body is superior to the mind by showing that the center for Nietzsche\'s ideas, the human essence, is more valid than that of Descartes.
Descartes\' idea of the human essence is based solely on his formed concept of "radical doubt." He believes the essence of human existence to be simply "a thinking thing". We must now analyze how he arrived at this conclusion. Descartes is famous for radical doubt, a concept that questions everything, and assumes nothing to be true unless it can be proved so with his idea of "clear and distinct perception." From this he states that the only thing he can clearly and distinctively perceive is that "I exist". He concludes that since he ceases to exist when he ceases to think, he can then clearly and distinctively call himself a "thinking thing". Descartes explains this train of thought when he says:
[quote][b]From the fact that I know that I exist, and that at the same time I judge that obviously nothing else belongs to my nature or essence except that I am a thinking thing, I rightly conclude that my essence consists entirely in my being a thinking thing. And although perhaps I have a body that is very closely joined to me, nevertheless, because on the one hand I have a clear and distinct idea of myself, insofar as I am merely a thinking thing and not an extended thing, and because on the other hand I have a distinct idea of a body, insofar as it is merely an extended thing and not a thinking thing, it is certain that I am really distinct from my body, and can exist without it[/b][/quote]
It is obvious that Descartes\' arrival of the human essence as a "thinking thing" in this way is fully based on his beliefs of radical doubt and clear and distinct perception. He bases all of his inferences on other inferences.
Descartes also devaluates the human body and places the mind at the essence of the human existence based on his concept. Due to his radical doubt, Descartes quickly omits the body and the entire physical world as having any significance because of the simple fact that they can be doubted. He establishes a strong sense of doubt in his senses, because, according to Descartes, one cannot know clearly and distinctly that they are not being deceived into their physical sensations. Descartes thus condemns the significance of the body when he proclaims that it is "not a substance endowed with understanding". He places the body into the physical, unintelligible realm of his concept of dualism, opposite from the thinking, knowledgeable realm. Descartes now acknowledges the body as being useful only within the limits of "moving from one place to another, of taking on various shapes, and so on".
It is from this condemnation of the body into the physical, unintelligible realm that Descartes further places the mind on a pedestal, and at the essence of human existence. To him the mind is superior because it thinks, which is in itself our essence. He explains this in the indented quote I have already cited, saying that the mind can exist without the body. Analyzing things with radical doubt clearly finalizes all of Descartes\' ideas.
Therefore, Descartes\' argument is not valid because of the fact that it is solely derived from assumptions. His idea of the superiority of the mind is based on the assumption that humans are thinking things, which itself is based on the assumption of clear
Topics Related to Nietzsche vs Descartes
Epistemology of science, Meditations on First Philosophy, Ren Descartes, Friedrich Nietzsche, Discourse on the Method, Mind, Will, Passions of the Soul, Cogito ergo sum
Essays Related to Nietzsche vs Descartes
Sociological Theory: Positivistic, Interpretative,Sociological Theory: Positivistic, Interpretative, and Critical Comment on the three types of sociological theories, explain and argue, based on your library or Internet research, which type of theory is the most appropriate theory for sociology to adopt. The three general types of sociological theory are positivistic, interpretive and critical theory.In determining which theory is the most appropriate for sociology to adopt,a basic understanding of each theory\'s strengths and weaknesses is nec
Theories Underlying the Constructivist ApproachTheories Underlying the Constructivist Approach Introduction According to Elliot Eisner: teaching is an art and the creations of the teacher in producing an engaging stimulating and insightful lesson are the result of using many different skills but these are influenced by qualities and contingencies that are unpredictable but all teachers do operate with theory where theory is a general set of ideas through which we make sense of the world And according to Peel (1967): psychology may be de
PlatoPlato Plato, the philosopher, centered his thoughts around the soul, which to him was the principal of life and movement. The immortal wisdom of Plato, is the guidance in which ethical theory and philosophy take root. His mentor was the great philosopher, Socrates. Plato, took the Socratic point of view and developed his main philosophy, which was the philosophy of the soul. THE LIFE OF PLATO Early Life Plato was born in 427 B.C.E. into a wealthy family that was both aristocratic and politically
A Comparison and Contrast of A Comparison and Contrast of Juergen Habermas and Hans Georg Gadamer 20083747 History 104 Nov.19/01 The intellectual battle between the Gadamer-Hermeneutics school and the Habermas-critical theorists is well documented. Hermeneutics claiming a universal applicability stating, being that can be understood is language, and the critical theorist claiming a reflective reasoning process that goes beyond hermeneutics. The battle has been aptly stated in the rather public disagreements between Ha
John Locke:John Locke: An Historical Analysis of His Thought and Life Intro to Church History Dec. 10/99 Box #260 John Locke (1632-1704) is perhaps one of the most influential philosophers the world has ever seen. His writings became the basis of the eighteenth century enlightenment reason. Basil Willey describes Lockes influence as such, Locke stands at the end of the seventeenth century, and at the beginning of the eighteenth; his work is at once a summing-up of seventeenth century conclusions and the
The Metaethics of The Metaethics of Ayn Rand and Objectivism Foundations of Ethics January 2001 Table of Contents o Introduction .. p. 3-5 Early Ayn Rand p. 5-6 Literary Period . . p. 7-8 Philosophical Period p. 8-9 o Metaethics p.9-10 Existence as Primary .. .... p. 10-11 Animate vs. Inanimate Objects .. p. 11-13 Life and Value . . p. 13-14 Fact and Value: The Randian Synthesis ... p. 15-17 The Rationa
THE LIFE OF PLATO THE LIFE OF PLATO Plato was born in 427 B.C. into a wealthy family that was both aristocratic and politically influential. His family had a rich history of political connections and consisted of his parents, Ariston and Perictione, his older brothers Adeimantus and Glawcon, and later a younger sister, Potone. In keeping with his family heritage, Plato was destined for the political life(Beavers and Planeaux). During Platos early years he was instructed by eminent teachers in grammar, music, a
The Ontology of Gay and Queer The Ontology of Gay and Queer Homosexuality: History, Politics, Ethics April /2001 Table of Contents Introduction .. p. 2-4 Definitions and Genealogy of Homosexuality p. 5- Genealogy of Ontology . p. Coming Out of the Closet: Conversion and Inaugeration or Integration .. p. Genetic Ontology, Social Artifice and Orientations ... p. Conclusion: The Sexual Tower of Babel and Politics of Ontology . p. -Introduction- In recent years, the gay commu
Should the fundamental question in epistemology beShould the fundamental question in epistemology be How can I know ? On the other hand, should it rather be What can I know ? INTRODUCTION: In this essay, I will look at both these questions as they both seem to play a major role in the study of knowledge. I will cover two of the main elements that correspond to these questions of attaining knowledge, Empiricism, and rationalism. In order to show examples of both these views; I will use the philosophical thinking of Rene Decartes, a rationalist w
An Enquiry Concerning Human UnderstandingAn Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Philosophy 103D Hume argues that it is beyond human understanding to know the causes of events, even the everyday ones that ordinary people think they know. There are indeed many things of crucial importance that are beyond our thought patterns. What we believe to be genuine information, actually rests upon our belief in matters of fact. Such beliefs can reach beyond the content of present senseimpressions and memory, Hume held, only by appealing to pre
Models of PsychologyModels of Psychology Biological views human behavior in biological concepts (inheritance, genes, stress, hormones) Psychodynamic (Freud) behavior is brought about by unconscious inner forces uncontrollable Cognitive how people understand and think about external world (Structuralism Functionalism) mental activities Behaviors Observable behavior should be the focus. (J.B. Watson) Humanistic Free will, facilitate human beings Psychology-Scientific study of human behavior and mental pro
International RelationsInternational Relations The study of international relations has been a contested ground for many decades. A specific indication of this would be explaining or understanding the nature or knowledge of the world. Many theorists from different schools of thought since the 1930s have debated the contributions made among themselves. The main terminology here initially is the epistemology or ontology of the research among international relations theorists, much confined within the boundaries of soci
DescartesDescartes How does Descartes try to extricate himself from the sceptical doubts that he has raised? Does he succeed? [All page references and quotations from the Meditations are taken from the 1995 Everyman edition] In the Meditations, Descartes embarks upon what Bernard Williams has called the project of \'Pure Enquiry\' to discover certain, indubitable foundations for knowledge. By subjecting everything to doubt Descartes hoped to discover whatever was immune to it. In order to best understand
PhilosophyPhilosophy Philosophy originated from the Greek language. It is made up of two words: philein which means to love and sophia which means wisdom. There are three fundamental questions in the field of philosophy which are referred to as the Existential Concerns. What can I know?, What ought I to do?, What is the meaning of life and my place in the universe? These complex questions are discussed in the basic areas of philosophy. Epistemology is the theory of knowledge. The major question
Ayn Rand and Objectivism: An IntroductionAyn Rand and Objectivism: An Introduction opinions and beliefs, but he finally accepts that they will not leave his mind and his destiny is sealed. In his recognition of his core belief (individual freedom), he knows that he cannot resist this immutable freedom. Briefly, this sentence is the summary of man\'s existence. Man knows he is selfish and those who allow self-interest permeate their being are often called greedy or evil. However, without selfishness, man is reduced from an advanced mind