Movie: Last of the Mohicans

Last of the Mohicans is set in 1757 in the third year of a war in North
America over land and territory. Mostly, the war is between the English and the
French, but each side has taken up Indian allies to assist them. The main story
in the Last of the Mohicans is the love of an adopted Mohican, Hawk-eye, and
Cora, the daughter of an English general. There are also other stories embedded
in the movie, which are harder to recognize. For instance, a second love story
between Hawk-eye\'s brother and Cora\'s sister. The life of Magua is another
story that the movie seems to slightly touch, but doesn\'t elaborate on.
As for the historical part of the movie, I think it is accurate in the
sense of the fighting style of the English. The "proper" way of war might be
fine in Europe, but against the Indians, standing in a line with bright red
coats is not the way to win. "…the soldiers\' uniforms splendid – though (and
that\'s a historic fact) idiotically ornate and impractical for warfare. It
wasn\'t until about 1916 that the British and the French saw the light and
stopped wearing all that Day-Glo, easy target colors" (Prof. Jahiel). For
example, at the beginning of the movie, Magua killed one soldier marching in the
line, and the guy next to him didn\'t even do anything until the commander said
to attack. They would also fire at the same time, leaving the whole squad
vulnerable to attack while they reloaded. By fighting in this manner, it
allowed the Indians to fight much more strategically. They would fire muskets
three at a time, so they could stop an oncoming rush while the others reloaded.
The Indians also took advantage of the English firing scheme. After the whole
squad of English soldiers fired their muskets, the Indians would rush in with
axes and knives, then fall back. This strategy would allow just a few Indians
to take out a relatively large number of English. "The British, we learn by the
proof in the pudding, are inept warriors, and lousy tacticians…Plus, they\'re
seemingly accurately described, both from the point of view of the historian and
political correctness" (Prof. Jahiel).
I also think the film did a good job with the weapons used throughout
the movie. The spears, bows, axes, and muskets look authentic enough for me.
The one weapon that I couldn\'t recognize was the axe-type club that was used by
Hawk-eye\'s father. I found this to be a remarkable weapon, used very skillfully.
Also Hawk-eye gets his name from his skill with a musket. He always seems to
have a gun when he needs it, and he never misses. Another thing that caught my
attention was the canoes used in the river chase scene. I\'m not sure if this
was an accurate representation of what the Indian canoes looked like, but they
were very pleasing to the eye, especially if they were make with the crude tools
the Indians had to work with. As for people, places and actions, I think the
film is mostly historically accurate because "His [Mr. Mann, director]
dedication to historical accuracy is not only admirable, it makes Mohicans a
convincing experience -- and a great-looking historical epic" (Alex Patterson).
Professor Jahiel states that the old forts, cannons, and encampments are all
painstakingly genuinized.
I think the central action or event would be the lives of Hawk-eye and
Magua. The English and the French were responsible for the war, which brought
them together, but as enemies. "The war creates a myriad of conflicts --
military, personal, tribal and romantic. In addition to rival Waddington, Day-
Lewis must contend with Stowe\'s patriotic father, fort commander Maurice Roeves.
He must also defeat bellicose Wes Studi (as the infamous Huron Indian, Magua),
who has a blood account to settle" (Desson Howe). As for the history part of
the movie, I think it was accurate in the fact that each side had Indian allies,
but I think the Indians fought mostly when there was a distinct purpose, not
just because they were at war. At first the major conflict seems to be the war
itself, but I think it might be Hawk-eye\'s and Magua\'s lives. The war is there,
but it is in the background. "The movie touches quickly on the fine points of
British-French-Indian-settler conflicts, so that they can get on to the story
we\'re really interested in, about the hero who wins the heart of the girl"
(Roger Ebert). Hawk-eye seems to be caught in his