Materialism and Happiness in America


Materialism: attention to or emphasis on material objects, needs or considerations, with a disinterest in or rejection of spiritual values.

The acquisition of material has been equated with happiness in this country. This is true today, and it was true during the 1920\'s, the setting of F.
Scott Fitzgerald\'s The Great Gatsby. That the majority of Americans believe that wealth and happiness are the same is a result of our market
economy that encourages consumption and conditions us to think that we need material possessions to be happy. According to Andrew Bard
Schmookler, "Wealth and human fulfillment have become equated in the predominant ideology of liberal society, even though the great spiritual
teachers of humanity have all taught otherwise." (17)

What happened to Gatsby\'s generation? The 20\'s was an age of a consumption ethic that was needed to provide markets for the new
commodities that streamed from the production lines (Cowley, 53). The same problem exists today ... our materialistic attitudes are a result of
the freemarket economy in this country. Consumers are taught that they need to have all these things that the businesses are trying to sell.

It\'s true that this desire for things is what drives our economy. The free market has given us great blessings, but it has in some ways also put us
on the wrong path -- the path to a selfish, unhappy society. Michael Lerner, who worked as a psychotherapist to middle-income Americans
notes that

"The problem is that the deprivation of meaning is a social problem, rooted in part in the dynamics of the competitive marketplace, in part in the

materialism and selfishness that receive social sanction. . . many Americans

hunger for a different kind of society -- one based on principles of caring,

ethical and spiritual sensitivity . . . Their need for meaning is just as intense

as their need for economic security."

Jay Gatsby had all the trappings of wealth: a huge mansion, fancy clothes, and expensive cars. His lavish, decadent parties were designed to
impress Daisy. But why did Gatsby feel he needed to flaunt his material wealth to win Daisy\'s love? Why was he so materialistic, and why are
we? Are material possessions what we need to be happy? Part of the answer is that people "seek in material possessions fulfillment that is
lacking in other areas, especially human relationships" (Schmookler, 18). The very fact that our market society feeds on economic growth like a
fetish is a clue that excess consumption does not really satisfy. It is like an addiction. We can never have enough. A famous study done in the
early 1970\'s by Richard Easterlin, entitled "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot?" found that "members of wealthy societies do not
seem happier than members of poor societies (119)." Perhaps they are more connected in their interpersonal relationships.

Our material yearnings are an attempt to satisfy the need for human relationships. Anthropologist Ashley Montagu had an important observation
about childrearing in capitalistic cultures: that "few peoples give their babies as little tactile contact as do Americans, especially as compared
with "poorer" societies (p )." The characters of The Great Gatsby had childrearing views that seem to confirm this observation. Tom and Daisy\'s
daughter is barely mentioned in the story and is treated as a minor appendage in their lives. Jay Gatsby\'s "insecure grasp of social and human
values (Bewley 47)" are reflected in his reaction toward the child:

"Gatsby and I in turn leaned down and took the small reluctant

hand. Afterward he kept looking at the child with surprise.

I don\'t think he had ever really believed in its existence before

(Fitzgerald, 117)."

Having lots of things is not what makes happy humans. The characters of The Great Gatsby, like many in America today, were engrossed in the
pursuit of private wealth. Jay Gatsby flaunted his material possessions in order to impress Daisy, but was he happy? Even if he had lived and
won Daisy back, true fulfillment would come to them both only when they realized "the need to switch from an ethos of selfishness to an ethos of
caring (Lerner)." Material belongings are not what he or Daisy needed to be truly happy.

The 1920\'s was an era, like the 1980\'s, of "mindless materialism and consumption