This essay Lsd And Mainstream 1960s Media has a total of 1911 words and 8 pages.
Lsd And Mainstream 1960s Media
Despite the negative portrayal in mainstream 1960s media, justifications expressed by counterculture activists for further investigation, education and experimentation under government control of LSD were rational and valid arguments. Sex, drugs, protests, war, political upheaval, cultural chaos, and social rebellion; the many comforts TV dinner eating, republican voting, church going, suburbia conformists tried to escape through conservative ideals, town meetings, and The Andy Williams Family Hour. National consciousness in 1960s United States was alive, but existed differently in every mind it dwelled, and stirred uninterrupted in every life to which it was introduced. A dream of money, success, and a house with a white picket fence still existed within the pandemonium of the nation and many still relished in the idea of “Americanism.” Television was a base for a magnitude of world news and national information. Television situation comedies created ideal families and contenting distractions from unsettling national realities. Mainstream media, both fact and fiction, influenced the nation’s minds resulting in the effect of political change and further media influence over the government. The new decade, along with the effects of the Vietnam War and the strong influence of television, began to leak from the cracks of the nation a new counterculture of rebellious teenagers, unfamiliar narcotics, and a wave of promiscuity. Among the many issues and events molding our nation into a new decade, came the question of government and mind control. For some it was the next step into human evolution, a potential tool for mind control, a liberator of human kind, but for most LSD helped define 1960s counterculture, in which it was deeply rooted.
LSD has proved that the mind contains much higher powers and energies, beyond the average10% of the brain that a typical human uses. These powers and energies, under the right circumstances, can be taken advantage of to benefit human kind spiritually, creatively, therapeutically, and intellectually. LSD has given human kind the option to chemically trigger mental energies and powers. Arguments that LSD is potentially a dangerous discovery and mind control should be strictly prohibited by the government holds much validity, although there are benefits and arguments of personal freedom of neurology to consider. Whether LSD reflects negativity as a weapon and mind control drug, or radiates euphoria as a mind-expanding chemical and sacrament, the choice to engage in such an experience should be through personal reasoning. It is not the states and other bureaucracies’ duties to take control of the human brain and body. We no longer live in an age of industrial muscularity, and in this time of neurological intelligence, we should have the individual choice and freedom to further engage in the depths of our consciousness, if we are so graced with an option to do so. “No one can limit, restrict, or try to control how you access, activate, manipulate your own brain through the use of drugs.” Temperance, moderation, and education should be applied to the use of mind control, but not restricting personal freedoms of neurology. Dr. Timothy Leary agrees:
It’s ludicrous and ominous to think that the government will try to limit, restrain, control where you’re going to put your head, and how you’re going to manage and direct your own neurology. That’s the basis of your own freedom. Now, as far as behavior is concerned, if what you do in your head leads you to violate any behavioral law, a traffic law, or impose on the rights of the people—then you should be busted. But in the privacy of your own home, your own body, and your own brain, that’s your business.
Likewise, other individual freedoms justifying further investigation, education, and experimentation of LSD under moderate government control are questioned. The freedoms of spirituality and creativity are, similar to neurological freedom, issues in result of the use of psychedelic drugs. Spiritually, psychedelic drugs, are sacraments: divine substances no matter who uses them, in whatever sprit, with whatever intention. LSD, along with other drugs generates spiritual discovery and perception. Creatively, LSD has extreme potential; it is “a tool to explore the creative attributes of the mind.” Dr. Oscar Janigar states, continuing that this tool could equal to “four years of art education.” The further appreciation of the power of human thought, and the
Topics Related to Lsd And Mainstream 1960s Media
Lysergic acid diethylamide, Mind control, Entheogens, Counterculture of the 1960s, Eli Lilly and Company, Timothy Leary, Psychedelic drug, Project MKUltra, Hallucinogen
Essays Related to Lsd And Mainstream 1960s Media
Teenagers And DrugsTeenagers And Drugs Effects of Drugs on Adolecents Drug use is the increasing problem among teenagers in colleges today. Most drug use begins in the preteen and teenage years, these years most crucial in the maturation process. During these years adolescents are faced with difficult tasks of discovering their self identity, clarifying their sexual roles, assenting independence, learning to cope with authority and searching for goals that would give their lives meaning. Drugs are readily, adolesc
HallucinogenHallucinogen While many drugs speed up or depress the central nervous system, there is a class of drugs that distorts how we feel, hear, see, smell, taste, and think. Called hallucinogens because users often hallucinate, or experience nonexistent sensations, these drugs are also known as psychedelic, or mind-bending, drugs. Some hallucinogens come from natural sources; others are made in laboratories. Examples of natural hallucinogens are mescaline, psilocybin, DMT, and marijuana. Mescaline, whi
The use of drugs among Americans is rapidly risingLSD The use of drugs among Americans is rapidly rising. They can be bought and sold almost anywhere, from the streets to hallways of schools. A drug on the rapid rise from the 70\'s is LSD. Some people attribute this to the fact it is extremely inexpensive, $2-4 a hit, the wrong belief by users that it is a safer drug than marijuana because it isn\'t physically addicting. However, LSD is a hallucinogenic drug that is very dangerous, despite popular belief. LSD stands for LysergicAcid Diethylami
Psychodelic DrugsPsychodelic Drugs Alcohol Alcohol is one of the most widely used drugs in this society. It is accepted as a part of social life. Its use is widely promoted via sponsorship of sporting events. Advertising infers that drinking is the path to happiness, success, romance, etc. There are references to alcohol and its effects from earliest known writings. Alcohol is consumed in the beverage form and sold legally in this state to persons over 21. Alcohol is absorbed directly into the bloodstream throug
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)LysergicAcidDiethylamide (LSD) First invented by Albert Hoffman in 1938. He was a Swiss chemist seeking to synthesize a new drug for the treatment of headaches. He obtained lysergicacid from ergot, a parasitic fungus that grows on the rye plant. From this he synthesized LSD. He tested it in laboratory animals for its analgesic (painkilling) properties using standard procedures. He stored it on a shelf for 5 years because it seemed inactive. Little did Hoffman know, he had just synthesized
SHOULD DRUGS BE LEGALIZED?SHOULD DRUGS BE LEGALIZED? There is a lot of controversy over whether or not drugs should be legalized. People will argue to no end on each side. Some people say drugs should be legalized because they have the idea that people are going to do them anyway, so why not legalize it? People on the other side say drugs shouldn’t be legalized no matter what the reason because they are harmful for the people that use them and also for others around the people on the drugs. I think drugs should not be le