Legislating Sexuality

On September 21, 1996, President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of
Marriage Act, a bill proposed by Republican Bob Barr of Georgia in order to
prohibit the marriage of gay and lesbian couples.(CWA) Although this bill
cannot be called "unconstitutional", by forbidding the marriage of same-sex
couples the government is taking a stand on an issue that does not require its
lofty opinion and judgment. Marriage has long been an institution that was
based on the love of two individuals and their future together. While
procreation is also considered in the definition, there are no laws in our
society stating that it is necessary, or even important. With this bill, the
United States government is not defending the "tradition of family" but instead,
enforcing prejudice and hatred against a group that is already struggling to
gain equal rights and acceptance in a society that has long closed its
collective mind to homosexuality.
Since the dawn of American history, equal rights among U.S. citizens has
been a hotly debated issue. With the Civil War and Lincoln\'s Emancipation
Proclamation, slavery was prohibited. Women gained the right to vote with the
ratification of the Constitution\'s nineteenth amendment on August 26, 1920(Cooke,
157). Although African Americans gained suffrage through the fifteenth amendment
in 1870 (Cooke, 151), it was not until the passing of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 that they were actually freed from discrimination by the government(Cooke,
150). Why is it then that in today\'s modern American society, an institution
that prides itself on being "the home of the free and the land of the brave", a
vast number of Americans are hiding beneath a shroud of ignorance when it comes
to the issue of homosexuality? It seems that the gay community is being
attacked out of fear and intolerance with this new bill, the same vices that
threatened African Americans and women. It is disturbing that even today, as
we prepare to enter a new millennium, such primitive forces are still at work.
Even the title of this bill is offensive, "The Defense of Marriage Act".
It implies that the tradition of marriage must be defended against corruption.
This notion is ridiculous considering that a marriage today should be based on
love between two individuals. There are countless heterosexual marriages that
end in divorce everyday. If people are to argue that the gay community will
destroy marriage, they are mistaken. Marriage has been long destroyed since the
advent of divorce.
Another argument in favor of this bill is that marriage should be a
union between a man and a woman for the sake of procreation. This is also
unreasonable because there are many couples today who opt against having
children for various personal reasons and yet no one is trying to force these
couples to have children. Alas, there is no reason why a gay couple should not
be allowed to adopt a child. Just like marriage, raising a child requires
unconditional love, patience and responsibility, virtues that all peoples,
regardless of sexual orientation are capable of fulfilling. The groups
supporting this law also argued that gay love and marriage is not an example of
"family values". The government does not have the right to decree who is living
up to this standard and who isn\'t. Simply because a couple happens to be of the
same sex, does not mean that they should not be allowed to raise a family in
peace. There are too many homes in today\'s society that are in shambles for the
government to be denying anyone the right to marry. Why the government has all
of a sudden felt a need to create yet another stigma/prejudice against gays
evades me. If the powers that be feel that they can legislate way gays after
they have only recently been afforded the opportunity to express themselves they
are sadly mistaken. I believe that homosexuality is innate and not a personal
"choice" as so many seem to think it is. Homosexuality has prevailed through
thousands of year\'s of persecution and discrimination and now that our society
finally is beginning to accept homosexuals, they are letting their voices be
heard. As to why the government or anyone for that matter feels threatened by
homosexuals is a mystery to me. They have never hurt us before, and what makes
people think that by allowing them to marry it will cause harm to our society?
If two people love each other, it should be of no one\'s concern.
Above all, this bill is grossly unnecessary. In a poll taken this past
May, it was found that thirty-nine