This essay John Locke: has a total of 3288 words and 20 pages.
An Historical Analysis of
His Thought and Life
Intro to Church History
John Locke (1632-1704) is perhaps one of the most influential philosophers the world has ever seen. His writings became the basis of the eighteenth century enlightenment reason. Basil Willey describes Locke’s influence as such, “Locke stands at the end of the seventeenth century, and at the beginning of the eighteenth; his work is at once a summing-up of seventeenth century conclusions and the starting-point for eighteenth century enquiries.” This man was consumed with his ideas of liberty, freedom, and natural or inalienable rights. He has been said to be, the Father of the American Revolution, which is thoroughly Lockean in its ideas and emphases. Locke heavily influenced Voltaire, the French philosopher, as well as Rousseau, Jefferson, and Franklin. He is the locus of every liberal philosopher in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Thus, we see that Locke’s influence is startling. An examination of his views on epistemology, religion, and church-state relations will be given, in their relation to the church and Christianity.
Locke lived through some of the most tumultuous times in England, filled with religious squabbling, revolutions, and was himself the locus of philosophical and theological controversies. He triumphed his thoughts on reason as the final arbiter of truth and instigated some of the first ideas of critical interpretation of the Bible. He pioneered a simplistic Christian faith, over and against the scholastic Calvinism and Reformation theology of his day. Locke, while being a part of his historical context, was one of those few individuals who seemed to be a revolutionary figure in himself.
The man himself was born August 29, 1632 in Wrington, a village of Somerset. He was born into a Puritan household. Locke’s mother died when he was only 22 years of age. The knowledge on her is very scant, but Locke often referred to her as a “very pious woman.” Locke was raised in a very strict home, with his father exacting much discipline and authority. However, Locke seems to have quite respected his father. A friend, Lady Masham, recalls that Locke, “never mentioned him but with great respect and affection.” It was in this strict, Puritan home that Locke first became acquainted with ideas of religious liberty and man’s inherent freedom. His father continually reminded him of the people’s right to an elected parliament. His father even fought in the Parliamentary army in the war of 1641, fought over the King’s right to impose taxes by executive order. Squadrito writes, “Economic, religious, and political conflicts were primary topics of conversations in the Locke household. The influence that this early education had upon Locke’s mature philosophical views was doubtless considerable.” Locke’s thought definitely had its beginnings at home, but he transcended this arena as well, for he would depart his home’s conservative views on scripture and a typical theistic epistemology.
Locke’s formal education began at Westminster. He sharply criticized the harsh school environment and its intense program of classical philosophy and language (Greek, Latin, and Arabic) studies. He disparaged the loss of time at the school because of its hyper-intellectualism. He would later say that he had, “lost a great deal of time at the commencement of his studies because the only philosophy then known at Oxford was the peripatetic, perplexed with obscure terms and useless questions.” Locke would develop his common sense philosophical systems out of this environment. His philosophy would seem to be in much contrast to the overly obscure philosophy of classical writers and contemporaries. In 1656, Locke graduated with a Bachelor of Arts, focusing on such subjects as language, Aristotelian logic, metaphysics, history, astronomy, and natural philosophy.
The seventeenth century is one of transition. As Kathleen Squadrito correctly notes, “The intellectual climate of the age was beginning to shift away from superstition and tradition toward the newly founded authority of reason and experimentation.” Locke was one of the main instigators of this change. Locke’s philosophy developed out of a love for medicine and the natural sciences. In 1649, Locke joined an experimental philosophy club, whose purpose was to apply philosophy to the natural realm. Francis Bacon had already critiqued philosophy and medicine as needing a new foundation-empiricism. Locke then began to work with Robert Boyle, the
Topics Related to John Locke:
Empiricists, Epistemologists, Metaphysicians, John Locke, Age of Enlightenment, Reason, Some Thoughts Concerning Education, Deism in England and France in the 18th century
Essays Related to John Locke:
BerkeleyBerkeley As man progressed through the various stages of evolution, it is assumed that at a certain point he began to ponder the world around him. Of course, these first attempts fell short of being scholarly, probably consisting of a few grunts and snorts at best. As time passed on, though, these ideas persisted and were eventually tackled by the more intellectual, so-called philosophers. Thus, excavation of the external world began. As the authoritarinism of the ancients gave way to the more
Third ExamThird Exam Third Exam. Take-Home. Due April 21st; your grade declines one grade level for each day late. If you use any web source, use quote marks and list citation; presentation as your own writing of a web source or a published book or article will get an F for the course (remember how easy it is to search the web). Retain a copy of your paper and be prepared to explain your answers in an oral examination. Instructions: Type your paper and write no more than 2,000 words in toto. Answer questi
Berkeley's Theory of ImmaterialismBerkeley\'s Theory of Immaterialism Free Will Determinism MW 11:45 As man progressed through the various stages of evolution, it is assumed that at a certain point he began to ponder the world around him. Of course, these first attempts fell short of being scholarly, probably consisting of a few grunts and snorts at best. As time passed on, though, these ideas persisted and were eventually tackled by the more intellectual, so-called philosophers. Thus, excavation of the external world began. As
Should the fundamental question in epistemology beShould the fundamental question in epistemology be How can I know ? On the other hand, should it rather be What can I know ? INTRODUCTION: In this essay, I will look at both these questions as they both seem to play a major role in the study of knowledge. I will cover two of the main elements that correspond to these questions of attaining knowledge, Empiricism, and rationalism. In order to show examples of both these views; I will use the philosophical thinking of Rene Decartes, a rationalist w
Kantian PrinciplesKantian Principles Kant wants to avoid the skeptical attack by excluding experience from his judgements. By doing so, he makes an attempt at evaluating moral acts in themselves (a priori), without any prior knowledge (a posteriori). This allowed him to avoid the empiricists of his time as they claimed that all of our knowledge, as well as our morality, stemmed from experience. His philosophical project was this: to find an a priori morality that did not rely on experience or prior knowledge, rat
PhilosophyPhilosophy When I was born, I did not know the difference between right and wrong. Now, I do. The word philosophy means the love of knowledge. One type of knowledge is propter quid, which ask the question why or how. In this paper, I will demonstrate how Socrates, Hume and Aristotle, three well known philosophers, would explain how I acquired this knowledge in relation to the principles of right and wrong. Socrates is the first philosopher, I will discuss. Since Socrates did not write anything d
True and FalseTrue and False True and False seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however we may inhabit, in much or even most of our knowledge the fuzzy area in between the two. Discuss the difficulties of attempts to draw a clear line between the two categories in at least two areas of knowledge. The question of the definition of true and false has for centuries of western civilization baffled the greatest of philosophers. The question being not just simply th