John Locke and John Stuart Mill's Definition of Fr
This essay John Locke and John Stuart Mill's Definition of Fr has a total of 1864 words and 8 pages.
John Locke and John Stuart Mill\'s Definition of Freedom
John Locke believes that man ought to have more freedom in political
society than John Stuart Mill does. John Locke\'s The Second Treatise of
Government and John Stuart Mill\'s On Liberty are influential and potent literary
works which while outlining the conceptual framework of each thinkers ideal
state present two divergent visions of the very nature of man and his freedom.
John Locke and John Stuart Mill have different views regarding how much freedom
man ought to have in political society because they have different views
regarding man\'s basic potential for inherently good or evil behavior, as well as
the ends or purpose of political societies.
In order to examine how each thinker views man and the freedom he ought
to have in political society it is necessary to define freedom or liberty from
each philosophers perspective.
In The Second Treatise of Government, John Locke states his belief that
all men exist in "a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose
of their possessions and person as they think fit, within the bounds of the law
of nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man. "
(Locke 4) Locke believes that man exists in a state of nature and thus exists
in a state of uncontrollable liberty which has only the law of nature to
restrict it, which is reason. (Locke 5) However Locke does state that man does
not have the license to destroy himself or any other creature in his possession
unless a legitimate purpose requires it. Locke emphasizes the ability and
opportunity to own and profit from property as being necessary to be free.
In On Liberty John Stuart Mill defines liberty in relation to three
spheres; each successive sphere progressively encompasses and defines more
elements relating to political society. The first sphere consists of the
individuals "inward domain of consciousness; demanding liberty of conscious in
the most comprehensive sense; liberty of thought and feeling; absolute freedom
of opinion and sentiment on all subjects, practical or speculative, scientific,
moral, or theological." (Mill 13) The second sphere of Mill\'s definition
encompasses the general freedoms which allow an individual to freely peruse a
"...life to suit our own character; of doing as we like..." (Mill 13). Mill
also states that these freedoms must not be interfered with by "fellow creatures,
so long as what we do does not harm them..." (Mill 13), no matter how odd,
offensive and or immoral they may seem to others. The final sphere of Mill\'s
definition of liberty is a combination of the first two. He states that "...the
freedom to unite, for any purpose not involving harm to others: the persons
combining being supposed to be of full age, and not forced and or deceived."
Locke and Mill\'s definitions of freedom must be qualified. Since the
definitions they present in their respective literature are distinct from one
another, when each philosopher refers to freedom or liberty they are not citing
the same concept. This distinction is necessary when comparing their positions
regarding the amount of freedom man should have in a political society. What one
philosopher considers an overt an perverse abuse of liberty the other may
consider the action completely legitimate and justifiable.
John Locke believes that men should be virtually unrestricted and free
in political society. Locke\'s rational for this liberal position lies in the
twin foundation of man\'s naturally good inclinations and the specific and
limited ends Locke believes political societies ought to have. According to
Locke the only freedoms men should lose when entering into a political society
are "equality, liberty and executive power they has in the state of nature into
the hands of society." (Locke 73) In Locke\'s ideal society this fails to limit
or remove any freedom from the individual, it only removes the responsibility of
protecting these freedoms from the individual and places it on the state.
John Stuart Mill believes that man\'s should be strictly limited in
political society. Mill differs from Locke in the basic principle that
individual who enjoy the benefits of living in political societies owe a return
for the protection society offers. Mill believes for society to function
properly conduct of societies members should "not injuring the interests of one
another; or rather certain interests; which either by express legal provision,
or by tacit understanding, ought to be considered rights" (Mill 70) Mill
furthers this statement by proclaiming that society may go even further. "As
soon as any part of a person\'s conduct affects prejudicial the interests of
others, society has jurisdiction over it, and the general question
Topics Related to John Locke and John Stuart Mill's Definition of Fr
Classical liberalism, Libertarian theory, Rights, Time travelers, Political philosophy, John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, On Liberty, State of nature, John Stuart Mill, Liberty, Liberalism
Essays Related to John Locke and John Stuart Mill's Definition of Fr
AustraliaAustralia INTRODUCTION Australia, island continent located southeast of Asia and forming, with the nearby island of Tasmania, the commenwealth of Australia, a self governing member of the Commenwealth of Nations. The commenwealth of Australia is made up of six states--News south Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, and Wester n Australia--and two territories--the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. Australia, including Tasmania but excluding external terri
Classical LiberalismClassicalLiberalismClassicalliberalism was the dominant ideology of capitalism during the periods of eighteenth century. It view was widely accepted. It said that government should just sit back and watch business so they do not cheat the government also to enforce contracts. The classical had many creeds they were Psychological, economic, and ,political. Each view has its own points. In this paper I will discuss those points and show you how Bob Dole is a classical liberalist. Psychological
Australia, A Country ReportAustralia, A Country Report INTRODUCTION Australia, island continent located southeast of Asia and forming, with the nearby island of Tasmania, the commenwealth of Australia, a self governing member of the Commenwealth of Nations. The commenwealth of Australia is made up of six states--News south Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, and Wester n Australia--and two territories--the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. Australia, including Tasmania but exclud
Classical liberalismClassicalliberalismClassicalliberalism was the dominant ideology of capitalism during the periods of eighteenth century. It view was widely accepted. It said that government should just sit back and watch business so they do not cheat the government also to enforce contracts. The classical had many creeds they were Psychological, economic, and ,political. Each view has its own points. In this paper I will discuss those points and show you how Bob Dole is a classical liberalist. Psychological
Differences and Similarities of LiberalismDifferences and Similarities of Liberalism The purpose of this paper is to treat the similarly and differences of liberalism. I will use John Locke and Adam Smith to represent classical liberals. John Stuart Mill and John Maynard Keynes will be used to show contemporary liberals. John Locke In John Locke\'s Second Treatise of Government he develops a theory of government as a product of a social contract, which when broken justifies the creation of a new government for the protection of life, li
SocialismSocialism The term socialism is commonly used to refer both to an ideology--a comprehensive set of beliefs or ideas about the nature of human society and its future desirable state--and to a state of society based on that ideology. Socialists have always claimed to stand above all for the values of equality, social justice, cooperation, progress, and individual freedom and happiness, and they have generally sought to realize these values by the abolition of the private-enterprise economy (see CA
Liberalism and FreedomLiberalism and Freedom Liberalism is a force that has produced change from the birth of this nation to the politics of today. Liberal tenets have been a basis of thought and action in American politics since well before the signing of the Constitution. Certainly, liberalism has had to transform in order to remain a legitimate force throughout the years. When considering this transformation, one may ask whether or not the ideas and goals of classicalliberalism have been lost in the conversion in
The French RevolutionThe French Revolution I. Absolutism A. Absolutism defined 1. In the absolutist state, sovereignty resided in kings--not the nobility or the parliament--who considered themselves responsible to God alone. 2. Absolute kings created new state bureaucracies and standing armies, regulated all the institutions of government, and secured the cooperation of the nobility. a. Some historians deny that absolutism was a stage of development that followed feudalism, but, instead, was administrative monarchy.
The American Revolution as a Product of the EnlighThe American Revolution as a Product of the Enlightenment 1 West and World History 23 October 2003 Enlightenment is as synonymous to the word liberalism as Mercantilism is to the word Mercenary when one considers the American Revolution. Many of the wars and debates fought in the late eighteenth century actually proved to be more towards taxation from British colonies, rather than the revolution. Citizens of the newly independent America were concerned more solely with the advancement of politic
A Comparison and Contrast of A Comparison and Contrast of Juergen Habermas and Hans Georg Gadamer 20083747 History 104 Nov.19/01 The intellectual battle between the Gadamer-Hermeneutics school and the Habermas-critical theorists is well documented. Hermeneutics claiming a universal applicability stating, “being that can be understood is language,” and the critical theorist claiming a reflective reasoning process that goes beyond hermeneutics. The battle has been aptly stated in the rather public disagreements between Ha
John Locke:John Locke: An Historical Analysis of His Thought and Life Intro to Church History Dec. 10/99 Box #260 John Locke (1632-1704) is perhaps one of the most influential philosophers the world has ever seen. His writings became the basis of the eighteenth century enlightenment reason. Basil Willey describes Locke’s influence as such, “Locke stands at the end of the seventeenth century, and at the beginning of the eighteenth; his work is at once a summing-up of seventeenth century conclusions and the
ConservatismConservatism CONSERVATISM... 2 Theorizing about Conservative Ideology.. 2 Development of Conservatism during 20th Century.. 3 Kinds of Conservatism.. 3 Conservatism in Turkey.. 4 Conservative Policies. 4 Conservatism is support the constrained governmental power 4 Conservatism feeds the democratic culture. 5 Conservatism support free market 5 The Relation between Conservatism and Liberalism.. 6 Conservative Democrats.. 6 Islam and Democracy, together?. 6 CONSERVATISM Theorizing about Conservativ
What is the difference between 'New’ liberalism anWhat is the difference between \'New’ liberalism and \'Neo-‘liberalism, and which is the more defensible form of liberalism? Liberalism is an enormously influential western political theory that underpins modern democracy and more. It structures political systems, bureaucracies, notions of citizenship, and self, and is often (though not always) conjoint to capitalism. “Liberalism is usually called a protean political theory because its emphasis has changed over the centuries and in different pla