This essay Immanuel Kant has a total of 596 words and 4 pages.
Immanuel Kant said that, besides the usual forms of knowledge - analytical knowledge and empirical knowledge - we also have a priori knowledge that is \'synthetic\' in the sense that it tells us something about the world. He applied this general theory to art by saying that in art we see beauty that we recognise through our a priori knowledge of beauty.
The possibility of such knowledge is easily disproved, following David Hume\'s argument, which Kant knew of. Suppose you had a belief, and you were considering whether it was synthetic a priori knowledge. To establish that it was knowledge, you would have to justify it. You could not prove it analytically, as it is synthetic; nor could you justify it from your observations of the world, as it is a priori. Nor could you justify it from any propositions that had been derived from analytic or empirical knowledge. What else is there? Only, perhaps, other synthetic a priori assertions. Well, if there are any other assertions that you take to be synthetic a priori knowledge, then trace them back to their antecedent premises. Those premises cannot be analytic (because they are synthetic), nor can they be empirical (because they are a priori), nor can they be derived from other synthetic a priori knowledge (because, by hypothesis, they are the basic premises). We have therefore exhausted all the possible sources of justification.
This argument obviates further consideration of Kant. For corroboration, however, note that what Kant claimed as synthetic a priori knowledge in physics has been found fallacious by scientific research. He said we knew a priori that space is Euclidean, but we now know it is not; and that all events must be caused, but we now know that some quantum mechanical events are not. Furthermore, his claim of objective moral values knowable a priori is demolished by the elementary consideration that any set of categorical imperatives begs the question of why we should accept the principle of obeying that set of categorical imperatives. Aesthetics may be another game, but Kant\'s track record does not inspire confidence.
Finally, in what Kant says about aesthetic judgements, he simply assumes - without any supporting argument - that aesthetic judgements are universal. Yet it is an everyday fact that aesthetic judgements are not universal. Highly erudite art critics differ radically in assessing works. Kant could claim that this is because large swathes of the art-critical community have defective aesthetic faculties, and cannot see artistic value when they see it. That can be dismissed on Popperian grounds of non-falsifiability: if there is no robust means of telling which works possess aesthetic value, then "aesthetic value" refers to nothing over and above whether a work is "agreeable".
Consider also Kant\'s basic argument for synthetic a priori knowledge. He says we possess some concepts (such as causation and aesthetic value) that cannot have been abstracted from our observations of the world, and they must therefore be \'synthetic and a priori\'. This is untrue, and suggests that Kant used too limited a notion of what counts as abstraction. For example: the natural numbers 1,2,3,... can indisputably be abstracted from observations, but Kant would balk at saying the imaginary square root of 1 can too. Abstracting is, however, only a further step in the same process. Likewise, causation is a higher-order abstraction from the observed world. We need posit no mysterious faculty of transcendental cognition to account for our having the concept. And, likewise again, the concept of aesthetic value is an abstraction from agreeableness.
Topics Related to Immanuel Kant
Kantianism, Justification, Enlightenment philosophy, Deontological ethics, Idealists, Immanuel Kant, A priori and a posteriori, Categorical imperative, Epistemology, Empiricism, Critique of Pure Reason, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics
Essays Related to Immanuel Kant
Utilitarianism or KantianismUtilitarianism or Kantianism Utilitarianism or Kantianism, Which theory of ethics is correct? In choosing an ethical theory one must ascertain which is right to them mentally because, To choose one over the other must mean that you believe in that one to the fullest extent. Thatís why I believe the only true Ethical Theory in life ďtodayĒ is Utilitarianism. The main Utilitarian value is happiness not for one person but for all of society. Utilitarianism is a very rational way of thought, in whic
Third ExamThird Exam Third Exam. Take-Home. Due April 21st; your grade declines one grade level for each day late. If you use any web source, use quote marks and list citation; presentation as your own writing of a web source or a published book or article will get an F for the course (remember how easy it is to search the web). Retain a copy of your paper and be prepared to explain your answers in an oral examination. Instructions: Type your paper and write no more than 2,000 words in toto. Answer questi
Kant and Millís TheoriesKant and Millís Theories Maritza Pelaez Philosophy 213 (Ethics) Spring 04, Section 1 Paper Assignment #1 Kant and Millís Theories In July of 1994, a disturbing case arose in regards to a man who murdered an abortion performing doctor. Paul J. Hill, a former Presbyterian minister, and later a strong activist in the pro-choicelife movementactivist, was prosecuted for shooting and killing, Dr. John Britton, an abortion performing doctor, and James Barrett, a clinic volunteer, James Barrett outside