"How Mosquitoes Came To Be": The Giant Lives On


Ben Daily
Carolyn Kremers
English 213-002
February 10, 1997

Every time I read the Tlingit Legend, "How Mosquitoes Came To Be," there
are certain questions that come to mind about where the legend came from and who
wrote it. The legend was first published in 1883 and later found by Richard
Erdoes, who included it in one of his publications, American Indian Myths and
Legends. Why is the human race so selfish to think we can be the hunter and not
the hunted. Although giants could be a dominant presence in our lives, humans
prove that they will not be over-taken.
Each time I read the Tlingit legend, a new question would arise in my
mind as to how this legend came to be and particularly, who wrote it? The first
question I thought of was, is he the only giant on the planet? This was
answered for me with the introduction of the giant\'s son. As I read on,
something seemed puzzling to me, the fact that why humans are so selfish to
think they are better than giants, let alone anything else. For instance, why
is it okay for humans to kill a chicken, roast it and eat it, and a giant is bad
to "kill humans, eat their flesh, and drink their blood"(11)? Later in the
story we learn that the giant also liked to roast the hearts of humans. Another
puzzling question I asked myself is, if the giant was stabbed by the human and
"The monster screamed and fell down dead."(12), why did the giant still speak?
I know this is a legend or maybe just a fictionous story, but if the giant is
also a spirit then that would be helpful when reading the legend. I will
analyze these questions in hopes of understanding the problems with humans and
giants, which I might add is still being dealt with today with mosquitoes
everywhere.
My first question, if this giant was the only one on the planet, seemed
answered toward the end of the story with the introduction of the giant\'s son.
When the human threatened the life of the boy giant as he asked where the heart
of his father was, why didn\'t he kill the boy anyway? As we all know, a boy
will eventually become a person, and the boy is in fact a giant, therefore by
killing the giant by stabbing him in the left heel, the human simply forgot the
son. There are a lot of parts in this legend that are very unclear and when we
ask why, who, what, where and when, we are led into yet another question to be
answered. Which leads me into my next question, What makes a human better than
a giant?
In the Tlingit legend, a human feels threatened by a giant and kills it,
why? I tend to think giants like to kill and eat humans, just as humans like to
kill and eat cows, chicken and other animals. So tell me gentle reader, what is
the difference? Is it that we are humans and we cannot be subject to be hunted
as we do other animals. The only explanation is that human nature will only
lead us to believe that we will not be overcome by anything except ourselves.
One possibility for the actions of the humans against the giant would be that
the giant can speak, and shows some intelligence, after all he did build a home
for his son and himself. Therefore the humans might have thought that the giant
was beyond reasoning with, thus the basis for killing the giant. Another
question that poked at my brain was that even though the giant was declared dead,
he still spoke the words "Though I am dead, though you killed me, I am going to
keep eating on you and all the other humans in the world forever"(12). Okay,
maybe as he was dying he muttered those words, but how do you explain the
laughing as his ashes were being thrown into the wind? If the giant was in fact
burnt to ashes how could he possibly laugh and talk to the human. My last
argument is how the ending was abruptly cut short and how it left the reader
hanging without knowing what happened to the giant\'s son. Also, if there is a
boy giant, what about the mother giant? I often questioned the credibility of
this legend and the author, but that is something that has to be