This essay Diversity Within English has a total of 1346 words and 7 pages.
Diversity Within English
In order to understand how language variation descriptors are used, we
first must understand what language variation is. We can say that the U.S. is
linguistically diverse because of the multitude of languages spoken here, but
we can also find diversity within these languages. All languages have both
dialectical variations and registral variations. These variations, or dialects,
can differ in lexicon, phonology, and/or syntax from the Standard Language that
we often think of as correct\' Language, although they are not necessarily less
proper than, say, Standard English. It depends on where, by whom, and in what
situation the dialect is used as to whether or not it is appropriate.
Most people are familiar with regional dialects, such as Boston,
Brooklyn, or Southern. These types of variations usually occur because of
immigration and settlement patterns. People tend to seek out others like
themselves. Regional variations tend to become more pronounced as the speech
community is more isolated by physical geography, i.e. mountain ranges, rivers.
Linguists have done extensive studies on regional dialects, producing detailed
Linguistic Atlases. Many linguists can tell where a person is from just by
knowing whether a person carries groceries home from the supermarket in a paper
bag or from the grocery store in a paper sack (Yule 184). And the person who
comes home from the supermarket with a paper sack serves to remind us that
language variation is not a discrete, but rather a continuous variable.
Characteristics of the dialect are more pronounced in the center of the speech
community and tend to be less discernible at the outer boundaries, where they
often overlap other regional dialects.
Within, and between, these regional variations we find the social
dialects. The primary social factors that influence dialects are class,
education, occupation, ethnicity, sex, and age (Ferguson 52, Yule 191). And
social dialects can vary on any or all three descriptor levels; syntax or
grammar, lexicon or vocabulary, and phonetics or pronunciation. Social
dialects are also where the described differences are often defined as
stigmatized or nonstigmatized (Ferguson 52). Stigmatized items include use of
the double negative (grammar), substituting the d sound for the leading th and
losing sounds like the middle r and the final g in ing (pronunciation), and
stylistic choices such as puke for vomit (vocabulary).
There are three main types of reactions to these socially significant
1. Social indicators - the speaker, and often the listener, is not
aware that these items are socially significant in revealing one\'s social status,
so the speaker makes no attempt to avoid them when speaking in a more formal
style. This would be someone who wants to take your picture, rather than your
2. Social markers - the speaker is sensitive to these items and will
avoid them in a more formal style of speech, although the speaker may not be
fully aware of why. Examples would be avoiding contractions, and phrases like
gonna or didja. Social markers are much more prevalent in American English than
3. Social stereotypes - even speakers who regularly use these types of
dialects are fully aware of the stigma attached to them. Social stereotypes
would include the copula deletion in Black English, and the loosing of sounds a
la Joe Pesci that produce phrases such as doze tree guys.
Closely related to these social class factors are education and
occupation. While occupations often produce their own jargons, a person\'s
occupation will also determine what style of speech is used. A lawyer and a
laborer would not be likely to use the same dialect on the job. Likewise, a
person with little education is not likely to use the same style of speech as a
college professor. This does not imply that the lawyer and college professor
speak a better\' variety of English, but because of more exposure to, and
familiarity with written English, which is usually Standard English, they tend
to speak that way, also. And because many people think of Standard English as
the norm, they also think of it as the more perfect English.
Ethnicity often produces language variation, particularly among recent
immigrants. But this would not explain the endurance of Black English and
Chicano English. The rather widespread survival of these dialects seems to
stem from the social isolation of the speakers (discrimination, segregation),
which tends to make the variations more obvious. Because the group itself is
stigmatized its dialect is stigmatized by association. Thus, the deletion of
the copula is considered bad\' speech, although Arabic and Russian also have
structures that leave out the copula and they are not bad\' (Yule 192).
Topics Related to Diversity Within English
Sociolinguistics, Language, Linguistics, Fusional languages, Dialect, African American Vernacular English, Sociolect, Prestige, Arabic, Register, English language, Variety
Essays Related to Diversity Within English
Trabajo LaobovTrabajo Laobov Compare and contrast, making clear the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, traditional dialectology and the quantitative approach pioneered by Labov. Refer to specific works in your answer. Before starting to answer the question i think that it would be interesting to know which are the principles of Labov´s theory: we could say that for Labov language is heterogeneous,not only in structure but also in its use. Because of the principle of this theory , that is based in va
A new Standard? A new Standard? In this paper, I am going to examine the notion of Standard English itself, in addition to its social implications. The aim of this essay is to explain the reasons why the regional dialects are gaining ground over the Standard English, and why nowadays the Standard has not a high status over other dialects. The main points which are going to be developed are these: § Differences between accent and dialect § What is Standard English? Different definitions about what Standard Engl
Language and thoughtLanguage and thought BBI3215 Introduction to psycholinguistics Assignment topic: Language and thought 1. Introduction Language and thought, these are the two distinct abilities possessed by human . These two unique abilities had enabled man to be more superior than any other living things in this world. What actually are language and thought? Are they closely related? Language does not exist in a vacuum. We use it for a variety of purpose and it is therefore molded by many factors. As it is used