Critique of "Death of the Author"

The title to the story "The Death of an Author," by Roland Barthes,
suggests this story may be a fictional novel about the story of an author\'s
death. Perhaps one might pick it up, and skim the foreword in hopes that beneath
the cover of this book there would be a mystery, a story of detectives, eye-
witnesses, clues, and a puzzle for the reader to solve. Before I read this
story, the title "The Death of an Author" brought to my imagination the
biography of a writer slowly drinking himself to death trying to finish the
story of his life, but the author would be stuck and depressed because his life
is not a story as it is boring and repetitive. I have read such short stories
with similar titles by authors like Raymond Carver and others. I was surprised
when I began to read "The Death of an Author" that a story with such a powerful
title would be a wordy, whimper of a passage.
The author Roland Barthes is a brilliant writer, he is able to weave
phrases and create new uses for verbs, nouns and adjectives. Though he is a
brilliant writer I have to assume that he was not a very bright man or that he
at least has very little common sense outside of the literary world. If he wrote
in a more simple, to the point modern style I would have read the story,
absorbed its content, and would not have given it a second look. The story
could be summarized into 3 lines and thus reduce the amount of paper it is
replicated on the amount of bandwidth required to transmit it, the space it
takes, and the time it takes to read it. I came to this conclusion after reading
"The Death of an Author" for the fourth or fifth time. I began to wonder why
does this man write this way? What caused him to have so much distrust toward
the critics? Those are the thoughts he was trying to persuade us not to think.
Barthes wanted the author of the story to be no more than a name printed on the
top or front of a book. Throughout the story "The Death of an Author," Barthes
refers to the author as a scriptor in stating "Succeeding the Author, the
scriptor no longer bears within him passions, humors, feelings, impressions but
rather this immense dictionary from which he draws a writing that can know no
halt." Barthes announces that a scriptor is superior to an author but they are
the same. Now if a scriptor is superior to an author this passage drags on and
on, never circulating around a single point. A scriptor does not try to make art
of the two-hundred and fifty-five symbols placed in front of him. A scriptor
arranges the symbols in an order that once decoded can be read back and can
convey whatever message the scriptor recorded. Barthes reveals his knowledge of
this in writing, "Once the author is removed, the claim to decipher a text
becomes quite futile. To give a text an Author is to impose a limit on that text,
to furnish it with a final signified, to close the writing."
I believe that Barthes is truly an author. His style of writing, as
demonstrated in "The Death of an Author," is wordy and not clear and it invites
self proclaimed critics and causal readers to try to read between the lines and
to criticize Barthes himself. We rarely look at the writers who write in the
magazine articles, newspapers, short stories that we read today. we read today
magazine articles, newspapers, short stories. We do not read these items to
gain the author\'s perspective on the subject. We read them for our enjoyment,
for the knowledge contained in them, or maybe so that by reading the story it
will become a part of us and we will become a part of it. It is lines like
"Though the sway of the Author remains powerful it goes without saying that
certain writers have long since attempted to loosen it." How come Barthes is
not one of these authors? Has Barthes made this critic situation worse? (If
this situation bothers anyone but Barthes). Barthes\' writing has a great
overtone of irony because everyone who reads this will criticize the author and
not the story.
When we over-criticize a story or a book, we as people tend to go deeper
than the words printed on the paper. We