This essay Animalism Vs. Marxism as Discussed in Animal Farm has a total of 1631 words and 8 pages.
Animalism Vs. Marxism as Discussed in Animal Farm
Animalism Vs. Marxism
Characters, items, and events found in George Orwells book, Animal Farm, can be
compared to similar characters, items, and events found in Marxism and the 1917 Russian
Revolution. This comparison will be shown by using the symbolism that is in the book
with similarities found in the Russian Revolution.
Old Major was a prized-boar that belonged to Farmer Jones. The fact that Old
Major is himself a boar was to signify that radical change and revolution are, themselves,
boring in the eyes of the proletariat (represented by the other barnyard animals), who are
more prone to worrying about work and survival in their everyday life. Old Major gave
many speeches to the farm animals about hope and the future. He is the main animal who
got the rebellion started even though he died before it actually began. Old Major’s role
compares to Lenin and Marx whose ideas were to lead to the communist revolution.
Animal Farm is a criticism of Karl Marx, as well as a novel perpetuating his convictions of
democratic Socialism. (Zwerdling, 20). Lenin became leader and teacher of the working
class in Russia, and their determination to struggle against capitalism. Like Old Major,
Lenin and Marx wrote essays and gave speeches to the working class poor. The working
class in Russia, as compared with the barnyard animals in Animal Farm, were a laboring
class of people that received low wages for their work. Like the animals in the farm yard,
the people is Russia thought there would be no oppression in a new society because the
working class people (or animals) would own all the riches and hold all the power.
(Golubeva and Gellerstein 168).
Another character represented in the book is Farmer Jones. He represents the symbol of
the Czar Nicholas in Russia who treated his people like Farmer Jones treated his animals. The
animal rebellion on the farm was started because Farmer Jones was a drunk who never took care
of the animals and who came home one night, left the gate open and the animals rebelled. Czar
Nicholas was a very weak man who treated his people similar to how Farmer Jones treated his
animals. The Czar made his working class people very mad with the way he wielded his authority
and preached all the time, and the people suffered and finally demanded reform by rebelling. The
Czar said “The law will henceforward be respected and obeyed not only by the nation but also the
authority that rules it - and that the law would stand above the changing views of the individual
instruments of the supreme power.” (Pares 420).
The animal Napoleon can be compared as a character representing Stalin in Russia. Both
were very mean looking, didn’t talk very much but always got what they wanted through force.
In one part of the book Napoleon charged the dogs on Snowball, another animal. Stalin became
the Soviet Leader after the death of Lenin. He was underestimated by his opponents who always
became his victims, and he had one of the most ruthless, regimes in history. In was not till very
many years later that the world found out about the many deaths that Stalin created in Russia
during the Revolution. For almost 50 years the world thought that the Nazis had done the killing
in Russia, when in fact it was Stalin. (Imse 2).
The last characters that are symbolic of each other are the animal Snowball with the
Russian leader Trotsky. Snowball was very enthusiastic and was a leader who organized the
defense of the farm. He gave speeches and instructions but was not very beneficial. All the other
animals liked him, but he was outsmarted by Napoleon. Trotsky and Stalin’s relationship was
very much like Snowball’s and Napoleons. Trotsky organized the Red Army and gave speeches
and everyone in Russia thought he would win power over Stalin. After Lenin’s death Trotsky lost
all his power to Stalin and was expelled from the communist party. He was at one time
considered the second most powerful man in Russia. (Trotsky” Comptons 290).
Besides characters there are many items that can be compared as symbols in the book and
in Russia. The whip that Napoleon used in the farmyard to wield power
Topics Related to Animalism Vs. Marxism as Discussed in Animal Farm
Marxist theorists, Old Bolsheviks, British films, Cold War films, Anti-fascists, Animal Farm, Napoleon, Snowball, Squealer, Joseph Stalin, Leon Trotsky, Russian Revolution
Essays Related to Animalism Vs. Marxism as Discussed in Animal Farm
Another FeminismAnother Feminism Q.1(b) Feminist approaches to sociological theory have developed out of historical sites of struggle for equality. Describe the strengths and weaknesses of four (4) different feminist theoretical orientations. Sociological theory is broadly concerned with structured forms of social inequality. Therefore, sociologist generally attempt to approach human behaviour and relations in terms of the particular social setting of different social groups, classes and etc. However, feminist
Marxmarx As stated before, the key classes in the capitalist mode of production are the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, or capitalists and landless wage laborers. While Marx recognizes that there are other classes, the fundamental class division is between this pairing of the exploiter and the exploited. The bourgeoisie derive their class position from the fact that they own productive wealth. It is not their high income that makes them capitalists, but the fact that they own the means of productio
Barbarossa, Soviet Covering Forces and the InitialBarbarossa, Soviet Covering Forces and the Initial Period of War: Military History and Airland Battle The issues surrounding the German attack upon the Soviet Union in June 1941 continue to attract the attention of historians and military analysts. The nature of the Soviet response to that attack has, as recent articles in Air University Review suggest, set off heated polemics. The appearance of Bryan Fugate\'s Operation Barbarossa with its assertion that the Soviet High Command did, indeed, hav
A Comparison and Contrast of A Comparison and Contrast of Juergen Habermas and Hans Georg Gadamer 20083747 History 104 Nov.19/01 The intellectual battle between the Gadamer-Hermeneutics school and the Habermas-critical theorists is well documented. Hermeneutics claiming a universal applicability stating, “being that can be understood is language,” and the critical theorist claiming a reflective reasoning process that goes beyond hermeneutics. The battle has been aptly stated in the rather public disagreements between Ha
Carnivalesque Resistance to Global Spectacle: A CrCarnivalesque Resistance to Global Spectacle: A Critical Postmodern Theory of Public Administration April 12, 2001; Revised April 30, 2001 Pre-publication draft of article published in: Administrative Theory Praxis, Vol 23 (3): 431-458. Abstract I propose a critical postmodern application of Debord’s Spectacle and the carnivalesque of Bakhtin to the theatrics I see happening in city streets, on college campuses, and Internet resisting the new globalized economy. In the past decade pubic administ
Adolf HitlerAdolf Hitler Hitler, Adolf (1889-1945) Founder and leader of the Nazi Party, Reich Chancellor and guiding spirit of the Third Reich from 1933 to 1945, Head of State and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, Adolf Hitler was born in Braunau am Inn, Austria, on 20 April 1889. The son of a fifty-two-year-old Austrian customs official, Alois Schickelgruber Hitler, and his third wife, a young peasant girl, Klara Poelzl, both from the backwoods of lower Austria, the young Hitler was a resentful, disc
Interpretation - Engagement requires DIRECT talks T Interpretation - Engagement requires DIRECT talks - means both governments must be involved Crocker 9 [9/13/09, Chester A. Crocker is a professor of strategic studies at the Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, was an assistant secretary of state for African affairs from 1981 to 1989. Terms of Engagement, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/14/opinion/14crocker.html?_r=1 ] PRESIDENT OBAMA will have a hard time achieving his foreign policy goals until he masters some key term